31.32% reward rate from protocol fees, minus 0.00% inflation
1.43% reward rate from protocol fees + emissions, minus 2.53% inflation
THORChain bonding vs Sui staking
Sui staking is built for liquidity: epochs last 24 hours and unstaking completes at the next boundary, making it the fastest exit among major proof-of-stake chains. The rate is correspondingly modest, low single digits, funded by a mix of decreasing stake subsidies and gas fees. THORChain bonding is slower on every dimension but pays from protocol usage at a historically higher rate.
| THORChain (RUNE) bonding | Sui (SUI) staking | |
|---|---|---|
| Real yield | 31.32% | -1.07% |
| Reward rate | 31.32% | 1.43% |
| Inflation | 0.00% | 2.53% |
| Yield source | Protocol fees | Protocol fees + emissions |
| Unstaking | Indeterminate: set by the node operator | Next epoch boundary (≤24 h) |
| Minimum | Set by each node operator | 1 SUI |
Figures retrieved on August 24, 2026 and they may be out of date. Real yield is the reward rate net of each chain's own inflation, and it is the row to compare on: a rate paid with newly minted tokens mostly offsets the dilution it creates. Any figure shown as "n/a" could not be retrieved.
Sui or THORChain bonding
The honest trade-off: Sui gives you a near-liquid position, a protocol that does not burn principal, and a low single-digit yield partly propped up by temporary subsidies that phase out over time. THORChain bonding locks you into a node relationship with churn-timed exits and slash exposure, in exchange for fee-sourced yield that has historically run far higher. Liquidity versus income, in nearly pure form.
Frequently asked questions
Which pays more, THORChain bonding or Sui staking?
Compare the real yield, not the advertised rate. Net of each chain's own issuance at the time this page was built, THORChain leaves 31.32%, while Sui leaves -1.07%. Those figures come from the headline numbers: THORChain advertises 31.32% (network bonding apy; changes with fees and bonded rune) against 0.00% of new supply a year, while Sui advertises 1.43% (typical delegation apy before validator commission) against 2.53% of new supply a year. THORChain's rate is funded mainly by protocol fees, while Sui's is protocol fees + emissions, and a rate paid by minting new tokens mostly offsets the dilution it creates. Both move constantly, so check live values before deciding anything.
Which lets me exit faster, THORChain or Sui?
THORChain has no fixed unbonding period: bond is released only once the node churns out of the active set, and then only when the operator opens the window, which is entirely their decision. Churn comes round roughly every 3 days, but that is the best case, not the expected wait. Sui: next epoch boundary (≤24 h). Neither is instant liquidity; the practical difference is how often the exit door opens and who controls it.
What is the risk of staking with the wrong operator?
On both networks you are backing a specific node or validator, and its behaviour is your risk. An operator that goes offline or misconfigures itself costs you rewards; one that acts maliciously can cost you part of the stake on networks that penalise it at the protocol level. On top of that, the dominant risk in practice on either side is the market price of the token itself, which no staking rate compensates.
Curious about the fee-funded side?
Browse THORChain nodes open to new bond (minimums, operator fees and slash history) and request a whitelist from your own wallet.
Find a Node